In 2024, the Georgia House passed the Promise Scholarship Act by one vote.
One vote is not a mandate. It is a warning.
When major education policy affecting every public school district in Georgia passes by the narrowest possible margin, it tells us something important: serious concerns were left unresolved. Those concerns followed the bill to the Senate, where it encountered difficulties, revisions, and continued debate. And today, those concerns are being voiced across our state by parents, teachers, superintendents, and taxpayers alike.
That is why I am supporting legislation that places a clear, honest question before the voters of Georgia in November 2026.
The ballot will ask: “Should the General Assembly repeal the Georgia Promise Scholarship Act, which, during the 2025–26 school year, provided up to $6,500 in state funds to students to be used for qualified education expenses, including private school tuition?”
A YES vote means voters believe the Act should be repealed. A NO vote means voters believe it should continue.
This is an advisory referendum. It does not repeal the law by itself. It simply allows the people of Georgia to give clear direction to their elected representatives.
That is not radical.
That is democratic.
At the heart of this debate is a basic question of accountability: If a public school system is struggling to meet state standards, should taxpayer dollars be redirected away from that system or invested to help it improve?
Across Georgia, school systems are facing well-documented challenges, including overcrowded classrooms, teacher shortages, uncompetitive salaries, aging facilities, and increasing student needs. These conditions do not exist because teachers or principals are failing. They exist because resources are stretched thin, and funding has not kept pace with rising expectations and costs.
Redirecting public dollars away from these systems does not solve those problems. It compounds them.
Why This Must Be Revisited
I did not vote on the 2024 legislation because I was not serving in the General Assembly at the time. My position today is not about re-litigating past votes. It is about responding to what we are hearing now, across Georgia.
What I hear is consistent and bipartisan:
• Parentswantclarity
• Teacherswantstability
• Superintendentswant predictable funding
• Taxpayerswant accountability When public dollars are involved, the public deserves a voice.
Let the People Decide
This debate is not about ideology.
It is not about attacking parents who seek options for their children.
And it is not about politics.
It is about whether a policy passed by one vote should continue without direct voter input.
If the Promise Scholarship Act is sound policy, it will withstand public scrutiny.
If it is not, the voters will tell us.
Either way, the decision will be made where it belongs: with the people of Georgia.
Leadership is not pretending a one-vote bill settled everything.
Leadership is listening, revisiting, and responding.
That is why I believe the people should decide.
-Griffin represents the citizens of District 149.